Traits of this individuals. Traits of this participants, stratified by HIV status, are shown in dining dining Table 1.

Traits of this individuals. Traits of this participants, stratified by HIV status, are shown in dining dining Table 1.

Traits of this individuals, stratified by HIV status, are shown in dining Table 1. The majority of men (60.8 %) considered on their own HIV-negative, 153 males (26.5 percent) HIV-positive, and 73 (12.7 percent) failed to know their HIV status at time of enrolment. The entire median age ended up being 37 (IQR 30–43) years. HIV-positive guys had been notably older and reported more lovers than HIV-negative or men that are HIV-unawareP Table 1 Characteristics of 577 males who’ve intercourse with males, stratified by self-perceived HIV status, Amsterdam, 2008-9

Online and offline partner and partnership faculties

Traits of on line and offline lovers and partnerships are shown in dining dining dining Table 2. The median age of this lovers had been 34 years (IQR 28–40). In comparison to offline lovers, more online partners were Dutch (61.3 per cent vs. 54.0 per cent; P Table 2 traits of 1781 intimate lovers and partnerships of 577 males that have intercourse with males, in the form of how a participant founded the partnership, Amsterdam, 2008-9

In extra file 1: Table S1 faculties of lovers and partnerships stratified by HIV status of individuals are shown. UAI had been even more typical in partnerships of HIV-positive guys (49 percent) compared to partnerships of HIV-negative guys (13 per cent) or men that are HIV-unaware28 percent) (P dining Table 3 Frequency of UAI by partner purchase (online or offline) by participant’s and partner’s HIV status

Association between online/offline dating and UAI

In univariate analysis, UAI ended up being a lot more prone to occur in on the web than in offline partnerships (OR = 1.36 95 per cent CI 1.03–1.81) (Table 4). The self-perceived HIV status regarding the participant had been strongly connected with UAI (OR = 11.70 95 per cent CI 7.40–18.45). Continue reading “Traits of this individuals. Traits of this participants, stratified by HIV status, are shown in dining dining Table 1.”